Verityx correlates work items, commits, pull requests, validation evidence, and release signals to produce reviewable delivery findings and exportable evidence packs for vendor assurance, invoice review, and internal governance.
Built for teams responsible for delivery assurance
CIOs, PMOs, vendor governance teams, transformation leaders, and engineering executives reviewing software delivery claims.
Review the structure of a Verityx delivery assessment, including evidence classification, traceability notes, and items recommended for human review.
7 stories flagged with evidence patterns that may indicate data quality issues. Manual verification recommended before drawing conclusions.
Read-only integrations
Business Case
Every enterprise software engagement carries delivery risk. Verityx makes that risk visible before it becomes a commercial problem.
Identify unsubstantiated effort claims before approving change requests or final invoices.
From months of manual forensics to reviewable findings in days, not quarters.
Replace assumptions about completion status with verifiable traceability from story to production.
Give CIOs and PMOs a factual basis for vendor conversations instead of anecdotal concerns.
Case Study
A mid-market manufacturer engaged Verityx to independently assess delivery claims from their outsourced PLM platform vendor. The engagement had been running for 18+ months with growing concerns about delivery quality, but no objective evidence to support or refute those concerns.
Acceptance criteria gap: 64.3% of user stories had no testable acceptance criteria, making it impossible to objectively determine whether delivery was complete.
Defect reclassification: 144 items categorised by the vendor as chargeable change requests were identified as defect fixes against original scope — representing significant overpayment risk.
Traceability breakdown: Only 15.2% of commits could be traced to specific user stories. 41.1% of all commits were merge commits with no functional content.
Scope feasibility: 12 features the vendor had not delivered were independently built and deployed, demonstrating that the original scope was technically achievable.
The client received a structured evidence pack that transformed vendor governance conversations from subjective concern to quantified, audit-ready findings. The evidence supported a formal challenge of approximately 42% of submitted vendor man-days and provided the factual basis for commercial renegotiation.
Client details anonymised. Engagement conducted under NDA. Metrics verified against source systems.
Audit Modules
Each module independently analyses a different dimension of delivery evidence, producing reviewable findings with full traceability.
Maps every user story to its associated commits, pull requests, and deployment records. Identifies stories marked as complete with no observable code evidence.
User stories, Git commits, PR merges, deployment logs
Traceability matrix with linkage status per story
Compares claimed sprint delivery against verifiable output. Evaluates burndown integrity, scope changes, and the ratio of claimed effort to deployable artefacts.
Sprint plans, velocity claims, change requests
Per-sprint substantiation scorecard with evidence gaps
Checks whether test artefacts substantiate completion claims for each acceptance criterion. Flags anomalous patterns such as identical test data or missing execution timestamps.
Acceptance criteria, test results, E2E evidence
Coverage report with confidence scores per criterion
Scope and Limits
Verityx helps teams review delivery claims against observable engineering evidence. It does not replace governance, commercial judgment, or legal review, and it does not infer misconduct from missing evidence alone.
All integrations are strictly read-only. Verityx cannot modify code, stories, test data, or any artefact in your environment.
Verityx augments your existing governance process with evidence. It does not replace PMO oversight, vendor management, or contractual controls.
Findings inform commercial conversations. Verityx does not approve, reject, or hold payments — those decisions remain with your team.
Where evidence is absent or ambiguous, items are flagged for human review rather than automatically classified as failures or misconduct.
Assurance Workflow
Link your Azure DevOps, Jira, GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket repositories. Verityx operates with read-only access — it never writes to your systems.
Verityx correlates every user story, commit, pull request, test artefact, and deployment record. Evidence chains are mapped from requirement through to production.
Unsupported, partially substantiated, or inconsistent delivery signals are surfaced with full evidence context. Every finding links back to source artefacts for human review.
Generate an audit-ready summary and evidence pack. Suitable for commercial review, vendor discussion, or internal governance reporting.
A fixed-fee forensic review for software deliveries where evidence quality, completion claims, or invoice readiness need independent assessment.
Best suited to active disputes, invoice reviews, delivery concerns before escalation, and high-risk programmes where leadership needs a defensible evidence pack quickly.
Typical use cases: invoice review, disputed sprint delivery, weak acceptance evidence, governance escalation.
Security & Controls
Defensible findings, auditable methods, and controlled data handling.
Verityx connects with read-only permissions. It cannot modify code, stories, test data, or any artefact in your environment.
Audit data is processed in isolated tenants. No cross-tenant access, no shared storage, no data commingling.
Every finding links to specific source artefacts — commits, PRs, test records — with timestamps and identifiers.
Scoring logic, verification thresholds, and exception criteria are documented and available for review before engagement.
Current controls are mapped to the Trust Services Criteria framework. Formal certification is underway.
Retention policies are configurable. Audit data can be purged on demand or set to auto-expire after a defined period.
Origin
Verityx was built after a real enterprise software audit exposed a major gap between reported delivery and verifiable engineering evidence. The problem was not a lack of dashboards; it was a lack of defensible traceability when commercial decisions depended on delivery claims.
Verityx exists to give technology leaders a calmer, more reviewable way to examine what was delivered, what is weakly supported, and what requires further scrutiny before payment, escalation, or acceptance.
Alfred Muthunathan · Founder · Nevodia
Get Started
Tell us about your situation. We'll respond within one business day.
We typically reply within one business day.
By submitting this form, you agree that Verityx may contact you about your request and related service information. See our Privacy Policy.
No sales automation, no spam, and no obligation to proceed.